ValidVisit
Comparison

ValidVisit vs Polygraph

Click-fraud detection and monitoring. Here's an honest, side-by-side look at how ValidVisit compares on detection depth, transparency, extra-hop requirements and ad-network coverage.

0–39 invalid40–69 suspicious70–100 clean
arbitrage-pub-447118
display-zone-7741
verified-partner-2b86

Illustrative example — the same 0–100 score, per source, worst first.

At a glance

Where Polygraph gives you a single flag per click, ValidVisit shows the transparent 0–100 score behind every verdict — per source, auditable, worst first.

Transparent 0–100 quality score on every click
ValidVisit
Yes — every verdict
Polygraph
Limited / varies
Network-level signals weighed on every click
ValidVisit
Yes
Polygraph
Varies
Device + behavior signals weighed on every click
ValidVisit
100+ independent data points
Polygraph
Varies
Native / push / pop network coverage
ValidVisit
46 networks incl. native/push/pop
Polygraph
PPC campaigns
Positioning focus
ValidVisit
Transparent measurement & attribution
Polygraph
Monitoring & reporting
No funnel hop
ValidVisit
Yes — lightweight script
Polygraph
Script-based (varies)
Raw IP never stored (hashed on arrival)
ValidVisit
Yes
Polygraph
Varies
Automated IP exclusion in Google / Meta
ValidVisit
Roadmap
Polygraph
Detection-focused

Polygraph capabilities are based on public positioning and may change — verify on their site. We don’t publish unverifiable accuracy claims about other tools.

Choose ValidVisit if…

You want transparent, auditable measurement: every click scored 0–100 across 100+ data points, attributed to the publisher/zone/placement that sent it — including the native, push and pop networks most tools barely cover.

Choose Polygraph if…

Affordable click-fraud monitoring and reporting.

Where Polygraph is stronger

Affordable click-fraud monitoring and reporting.

If automated IP exclusion pushed straight into the ad platform is your top priority today, a dedicated blocker like Polygraph leads there. ValidVisit detects, scores and attributes — automated platform exclusion is on our roadmap.

ValidVisit's wedge

  • 0–100

    An auditable quality score on every click, built from 100+ data points

  • 46 networks

    Attribution incl. the native/push/pop channels where invalid traffic concentrates

  • No funnel hop

    One lightweight script — nothing added to your click path

Genuine humans pass, bots stand out — and every verdict shows its work. See the protection overview or the full comparison.

Watch ValidVisit score your own traffic 0–100 — early access is open.

FAQ

Is ValidVisit a good Polygraph alternative?+
If you want a transparent, explainable view of invalid traffic — every click weighed against 100+ independent data points and scored 0–100, with the breakdown laid out so you can audit and defend it, plus coverage of native/push/pop networks — ValidVisit is a strong complement or alternative. If your priority today is automated IP exclusion pushed into Google/Meta, Polygraph leads there; that's on ValidVisit's roadmap.
What does ValidVisit do that Polygraph typically doesn't?+
A transparent 0–100 quality score on every click — each one weighed against 100+ independent data points spanning the network it came from, the device behind it and how the visitor behaves, with the breakdown there for you to audit — plus attribution across 46 ad-network tracking tokens including native/push/pop, all without a funnel hop.
Where is Polygraph stronger?+
Affordable click-fraud monitoring and reporting.
Can I run both?+
Yes. Many teams run a blocker for automated exclusion and ValidVisit for independent, transparent measurement and per-publisher evidence across all paid sources.

See what your paid traffic really is.

Bots, fake clicks and invalid traffic detected and scored 0–100 — one script, no funnel hop.

Just your email · no card · unsubscribe anytime · privacy policy

Free trial at launch · lock in early-access pricing

One script · raw IP never stored · GDPR legitimate-interest basis