All comparisons
Comparison

ValidVisit vs fraud0

Invalid-traffic detection with automated Google Ads refund recovery. Here’s an honest, side-by-side look at how ValidVisit compares on detection depth, transparency, extra-hop requirements and ad-network coverage.

How ValidVisit works →
Choose ValidVisit if

You want auditable measurement: every visit judged Valid or Invalid across 100+ data points, attributed to the publisher, zone and placement that sent it — including the native, push and pop networks.

Choose fraud0 if

Automated Google Ads refund claims, plus exclusion audiences pushed to Google, Meta, Microsoft, DV360, CM360 and Criteo.

Many teams run both: a blocker for automated exclusion, ValidVisit for independent per-visit evidence across every paid source.

01 / COMPARE

Where a flag becomes a verdict.

Instead of an unexplained flag, ValidVisit judges every visit Valid or Invalid, with its evidence — per source, auditable, worst first.

Platform coverage
ValidVisit
48 verified networks incl. native/push/pop
fraud0
Web & paid acquisition
Positioning focus
ValidVisit
Measurement & attribution, plus your traffic rules
fraud0
Detection, exclusion + refund recovery
How it is installed
ValidVisit
One script on your pages + tracking tokens in ad URLs
fraud0
Site script + GA4 and ad-platform connectors
Automated exclusion pushed into ad platforms
ValidVisit
No — you decide what to cut
fraud0
Yes — core feature

fraud0 details come from its public materials and our review of its product pages; prices on this page carry the date we checked them. They may have changed — verify on their site. We don’t publish unverifiable accuracy claims about other tools.

validvisit · console
deal-alerts.example71% invalid
zone 447123% invalid
premium-news.example2% invalid

One verdict on every visit, rolled up per source, worst first — down to the placement you buy.

See your own paid traffic judged Valid or Invalid, source by source.

02 / WEDGE

What you get that a blocker doesn’t.

Genuine humans pass, bots stand out — and every verdict comes with its evidence.

Valid / Invalid

An auditable verdict on every visit, built from 100+ data points.

48 networks

Attribution across the native, push and pop channels where invalid traffic concentrates.

No funnel hop

One lightweight script — nothing added to your click path.

03 / TRADE-OFFS

Where fraud0 is stronger.

Automated Google Ads refund claims, plus exclusion audiences pushed to Google, Meta, Microsoft, DV360, CM360 and Criteo.

If you want exclusions pushed straight into the ad platform automatically, fraud0 does that. ValidVisit never will: it detects, judges and attributes, and the decision to cut a source stays with you.

04 / IN DEPTH

ValidVisit vs fraud0, in depth.

fraud0 is an invalid-traffic platform with a distinctive flagship: it files Google Ads refund claims for invalid clicks automatically and charges a success fee on what it recovers. Around that sit two modules. Onsite Intelligence checks the validity of traffic on your own site, connects to GA4, enriches CRM form fills as bot or human, and pushes IP exclusions and negative audiences into Google, Meta, Microsoft, DV360, CM360 and Criteo. In-Ad Measurement looks at placement quality across DSPs (made-for-advertising sites, viewability, pixel stuffing, ad stacking and domain spoofing), which it detects and lets you export. Recovering money and cleaning audiences automatically are real strengths, and ValidVisit does neither. ValidVisit never files claims, never excludes for you and never writes to your ad accounts. It judges each paid visit Valid or Invalid on your landing page and attributes it to the campaign, publisher, zone or widget that sent it, through the ad network’s own tracking tokens. The two products end in different places: fraud0 in money back and cleaner audiences, ValidVisit in a record you act on.

Refund recovery vs a judged record

fraud0’s recovery workflow is something most tools in this category do not offer: it files Google Ads refund claims for invalid clicks on your behalf, and its pricing adds a 33.33% success fee on recovered ad spend on top of the plan. If getting money back from Google is the goal and you would rather not do the paperwork, that is what it is built for.

ValidVisit files nothing. What it produces is the evidence layer: each visit judged Valid or Invalid, with its evidence, and attributed to the exact source over any date range you choose, with evidence in your dashboard. That record is useful whatever you do next, whether you exclude a placement, cut a bid or take a quality problem back to a traffic partner. If you want to pursue a refund yourself, the Google Ads refund playbook and refunds by network cover how that works on each network.

The cost models follow from that split. fraud0 earns more when it recovers more. ValidVisit bills on visits judged, whatever you recover.

A yes/no flag in the data layer vs a verdict by source

fraud0’s verdict reaches your stack as a binary bot flag, yes or no, pushed to the Google Tag Manager data layer. That is simple to consume: a tag can fire or not, an audience can include or exclude, and it is exactly the shape an automated exclusion or refund claim needs.

ValidVisit returns a verdict with its evidence. Each visit is judged Valid or Invalid, and the verdict is attributed to the source that sent the visit, so a source with one bad day reads differently from a structurally invalid one, and the natural question becomes which publisher, zone or widget is dragging a campaign down, not only how many bots arrived.

For a buyer who acts by hand, the evidence per source is the point. For a workflow that acts automatically, a flag in the data layer is often the better input, and fraud0 is designed around that workflow.

In-ad measurement: a second product we do not build

fraud0’s In-Ad Measurement module works on the impression side, across DSPs. It looks for made-for-advertising sites, viewability problems, pixel stuffing, ad stacking and domain spoofing, and lets you export what it finds. That is verification of where your ads ran, a separate discipline from judging who arrived on your page, and ValidVisit does not do it.

ValidVisit is entirely landing-page side. It sees the visit, not the impression, and it judges that visit whichever network sent it, including native, push and pop inventory. It sets no cookies, builds no device IDs and never stores the raw IP, which is hashed on arrival. If you buy programmatic display through DSPs and need placement verification, fraud0 covers ground we do not. If you buy clicks and need to know which sources send real visitors, that is our whole job.

FAQ

Common questions.

What does fraud0’s refund recovery cost?+
When we checked in July 2026, fraud0’s Starter plan was €50 a month (€480 a year billed annually) for detection, and refund recovery added a success fee of 33.33% of the ad spend it recovers. ValidVisit does not file refund claims and charges no success fee; its plans are $59, $99 and from $299 a month, billed on visits judged.
fraud0 counts sessions and ValidVisit counts visits. Are the plans comparable?+
Roughly. fraud0 tiers by monthly sessions (up to 50k, up to 100k, and above), and ValidVisit by monthly visits judged. Both count arrivals rather than ad spend or unique visitors, so an estimate of monthly paid sessions from your analytics is a fair starting point for either. The difference is what the price buys: fraud0 includes exclusion and offers refund recovery, while ValidVisit centres on judging each visit and attributing it to the publisher, zone or widget.
fraud0 says 37% of owned and direct traffic is invalid. Will ValidVisit find the same?+
Probably not the same number, because it is not measuring the same thing. The 37% is fraud0’s own headline claim about owned and direct traffic, which we have not verified. ValidVisit judges paid visits and attributes them to the source that sent them, so its figure is specific to you: the share of each campaign’s and each source’s visits that were judged Invalid over the window you choose.
Could fraud0 manage exclusions on the same Google Ads account ValidVisit reports on?+
Yes. fraud0 writes exclusion lists and files claims; ValidVisit writes nothing to the account, so the two cannot collide. Running them together gives you an independent verdict on the visits that still arrive after fraud0’s exclusions, which is a useful check when one system both decides and reports on how well its decisions worked.
deal-alerts.example71% invalid
zone 447123% invalid
premium-news.example2% invalid

Judge the verdicts on your own traffic.

One script, every visit judged Valid or Invalid and attributed to the source that sent it — see what your paid traffic really is.

Just your email · no card · unsubscribe anytime · privacy policy

Join the waitlist with just your email · 7-day trial at launch

One script · no cookies · no device IDs · raw IP never stored