All comparisons
Comparison

ValidVisit vs Opticks

Ad-tech-native ad-fraud and bot detection, with automated prevention. Here’s an honest, side-by-side look at how ValidVisit compares on detection depth, transparency, extra-hop requirements and ad-network coverage.

How ValidVisit works →
Choose ValidVisit if

You want auditable measurement: every visit judged Valid or Invalid across 100+ data points, attributed to the publisher, zone and placement that sent it — including the native, push and pop networks.

Choose Opticks if

Ad-tech-native detection with automated prevention and integrations into ad-platform workflows.

Many teams run both: a blocker for automated exclusion, ValidVisit for independent per-visit evidence across every paid source.

01 / COMPARE

Where a flag becomes a verdict.

Instead of an unexplained flag, ValidVisit judges every visit Valid or Invalid, with its evidence — per source, auditable, worst first.

Platform coverage
ValidVisit
48 verified networks incl. native/push/pop
Opticks
Native, search, social & affiliate
Positioning focus
ValidVisit
Measurement & attribution, plus your traffic rules
Opticks
Detection + automated prevention
How it is installed
ValidVisit
One script on your pages + tracking tokens in ad URLs
Opticks
Sensor tag + ad-platform integrations
Automated exclusion pushed into ad platforms
ValidVisit
No — you decide what to cut
Opticks
Yes — core feature

Opticks details come from its public materials and our review of its product pages; prices on this page carry the date we checked them. They may have changed — verify on their site. We don’t publish unverifiable accuracy claims about other tools.

validvisit · console
deal-alerts.example71% invalid
zone 447123% invalid
premium-news.example2% invalid

One verdict on every visit, rolled up per source, worst first — down to the placement you buy.

See your own paid traffic judged Valid or Invalid, source by source.

02 / WEDGE

What you get that a blocker doesn’t.

Genuine humans pass, bots stand out — and every verdict comes with its evidence.

Valid / Invalid

An auditable verdict on every visit, built from 100+ data points.

48 networks

Attribution across the native, push and pop channels where invalid traffic concentrates.

No funnel hop

One lightweight script — nothing added to your click path.

03 / TRADE-OFFS

Where Opticks is stronger.

Ad-tech-native detection with automated prevention and integrations into ad-platform workflows.

If you want exclusions pushed straight into the ad platform automatically, Opticks does that. ValidVisit never will: it detects, judges and attributes, and the decision to cut a source stays with you.

04 / IN DEPTH

ValidVisit vs Opticks, in depth.

Opticks is an ad-fraud detection and prevention platform with its roots in affiliate and PPC work. It markets around 30 fraud signals combined into one score, then a binary invalid-or-not verdict for each scan, framed on the IAB’s split between general and sophisticated invalid traffic, GIVT and SIVT. From its Pro tier up it acts on that verdict, pushing exclusions into Google, Meta, Microsoft, TikTok and Taboola, and it can suppress postbacks and leads. It also offers a public REST API with a developer portal. It does not block visitors on your site; in its own words, it never blocks access to any user. ValidVisit’s verdict does not block either, though its traffic rules can send visitors you name by country, data-center hosting or VPN to another page. So the real differences are the shape of the verdict, what each pricing tier buys, and who the product is built around. ValidVisit judges each paid visit Valid or Invalid on your landing page and attributes it to the campaign, publisher, zone or widget that sent it through the network’s own tracking tokens. It reports and never writes to your ad accounts, so every exclusion stays your decision.

IAB GIVT/SIVT taxonomy vs one plain verdict

Opticks frames its verdicts on the IAB split between general invalid traffic (GIVT), which announces itself, and sophisticated invalid traffic (SIVT), which is built to look human. For agency and programmatic buyers that is a real advantage: it is the vocabulary industry reporting uses, so an Opticks verdict can be reconciled against the rest of their stack. Each scan resolves to invalid or not, which is the shape an automated exclusion needs.

ValidVisit also judges each visit Valid or Invalid, but it files the verdict under the source instead of a taxonomy. Every verdict comes with its evidence, and a source is described by its invalid share, so a zone with one bad day reads differently from one that is structurally invalid before you act. ValidVisit does not attach an IAB category to each visit; if you need GIVT and SIVT labels to reconcile against other reporting, Opticks is closer to that need. Our guide to invalid traffic explains the split in plain terms.

A label is easier to reconcile. A verdict with its evidence is easier to argue with, which matters when you are the one deciding what to cut.

Lite, Pro and Max: where prevention starts

Opticks bills on monthly scans, with tiers published when we checked in July 2026: Lite at €50 a month for 10k scans, detection only; Pro from €200 a month for 100k scans, where prevention starts; Max at €699 for 300k; and a custom Enterprise tier. Its public pricing page, FAQ and docs did not define whether a scan is a page view, a session or a click. The trial is self-serve and needs no card.

ValidVisit bills on visits judged: $59, $99 and from $299 a month (see pricing). There is no prevention tier to unlock: every plan has the full detection and attribution engine and the same traffic rules, and plans differ by visits, sites and retention. No plan pushes exclusions into your ad platforms.

The cleanest comparison is Opticks Lite against ValidVisit, since neither pushes anything into your ad platforms. Beyond that, the question is whether you want Opticks to push exclusions for you, which starts at Pro, or to make those exclusions yourself from a per-source record.

Built for affiliates and developers vs built for media buyers

Opticks shows its affiliate and PPC roots. It passes up to four custom variables through its macros, treats a lead as a first-class object it can suppress, offers an agency-oriented Firewall feature, and exposes a public REST API with a developer portal, positioned partly as an API for AI agents. If you run an affiliate programme, need to stop paying out on bad leads, or want to build your own tooling on top of fraud verdicts, those are real reasons to pick it.

ValidVisit is built around the media buyer working a traffic source. It reads the tracking tokens each ad network already offers (site, zone, publisher, widget), so a verdict arrives filed under the source you can block, on networks like MGID, Zeropark and RichAds as well as search and social. It does not suppress leads or postbacks. Opticks lists Taboola among its exclusion integrations; ValidVisit’s depth is the long tail of native, push and pop networks around it.

FAQ

Common questions.

What is an Opticks scan, and is it the same as a ValidVisit visit?+
Not necessarily. Opticks bills on monthly scans, but when we checked its pricing page, FAQ and developer docs in July 2026, none of them defined a scan as a page view, a session or a click. ValidVisit bills on visits judged, where one visit is one arrival on your landing page. When comparing prices, ask Opticks how your traffic converts to scans.
Does Opticks block visitors on my website?+
No. Opticks states that it never blocks access to any user. ValidVisit’s verdict never blocks either; its traffic rules can send visitors you name by country, data-center hosting or VPN to another page, and block whole countries at your own firewall with a rule it writes. The bigger difference is on the ad-platform side: from its Pro tier, Opticks pushes exclusions into Google, Meta, Microsoft, TikTok and Taboola, and it can suppress postbacks and leads. ValidVisit does neither; it reports, and you exclude.
If Opticks already excludes on Taboola, what would ValidVisit add?+
A per-source record next to the exclusions, and coverage of the many push and pop networks that are not among Opticks’ listed integrations. On Taboola itself, ValidVisit judges each visit Valid or Invalid and files it under the site ID that sent it, an independent read of what is still arriving after exclusions. ValidVisit never writes to your ad account, so nothing conflicts.
Opticks Lite and ValidVisit are both detection-only. How do they differ?+
Opticks Lite, €50 a month when we checked in July 2026, is detection without prevention, with prevention reserved for Pro and above. Every ValidVisit plan has the whole engine (detection, attribution and traffic rules), and none pushes exclusions into your ad platforms. Opticks returns an invalid-or-not verdict per scan on the GIVT/SIVT split; ValidVisit returns a Valid or Invalid verdict per visit, with its evidence, attributed to the publisher, zone or widget that sent it.
deal-alerts.example71% invalid
zone 447123% invalid
premium-news.example2% invalid

Judge the verdicts on your own traffic.

One script, every visit judged Valid or Invalid and attributed to the source that sent it — see what your paid traffic really is.

Just your email · no card · unsubscribe anytime · privacy policy

Join the waitlist with just your email · 7-day trial at launch

One script · no cookies · no device IDs · raw IP never stored