ValidVisit
Comparison

ValidVisit vs CHEQ

Enterprise go-to-market security and click-fraud suite. Here's an honest, side-by-side look at how ValidVisit compares on detection depth, transparency, extra-hop requirements and ad-network coverage.

0–39 invalid40–69 suspicious70–100 clean
arbitrage-pub-447118
display-zone-7741
verified-partner-2b86

Illustrative example — the same 0–100 score, per source, worst first.

At a glance

Where CHEQ gives you a single flag per click, ValidVisit shows the transparent 0–100 score behind every verdict — per source, auditable, worst first.

Transparent 0–100 quality score on every click
ValidVisit
Yes — every verdict
CHEQ
Limited / varies
Network-level signals weighed on every click
ValidVisit
Yes
CHEQ
Varies
Device + behavior signals weighed on every click
ValidVisit
100+ independent data points
CHEQ
Varies
Native / push / pop network coverage
ValidVisit
46 networks incl. native/push/pop
CHEQ
Enterprise web + ad security
Positioning focus
ValidVisit
Transparent measurement & attribution
CHEQ
Go-to-market security suite
No funnel hop
ValidVisit
Yes — lightweight script
CHEQ
Script-based (varies)
Raw IP never stored (hashed on arrival)
ValidVisit
Yes
CHEQ
Varies
Automated IP exclusion in Google / Meta
ValidVisit
Roadmap
CHEQ
Yes — core feature

CHEQ capabilities are based on public positioning and may change — verify on their site. We don’t publish unverifiable accuracy claims about other tools.

Choose ValidVisit if…

You want transparent, auditable measurement: every click scored 0–100 across 100+ data points, attributed to the publisher/zone/placement that sent it — including the native, push and pop networks most tools barely cover.

Choose CHEQ if…

Broad enterprise feature set spanning click fraud, analytics security and compliance.

Many teams run both: a blocker for automated exclusion, ValidVisit for independent scored evidence across every paid source.

Where CHEQ is stronger

Broad enterprise feature set spanning click fraud, analytics security and compliance.

If automated IP exclusion pushed straight into the ad platform is your top priority today, a dedicated blocker like CHEQ leads there. ValidVisit detects, scores and attributes — automated platform exclusion is on our roadmap.

ValidVisit's wedge

  • 0–100

    An auditable quality score on every click, built from 100+ data points

  • 46 networks

    Attribution incl. the native/push/pop channels where invalid traffic concentrates

  • No funnel hop

    One lightweight script — nothing added to your click path

Genuine humans pass, bots stand out — and every verdict shows its work. See the protection overview or the full comparison.

Watch ValidVisit score your own traffic 0–100 — early access is open.

FAQ

Is ValidVisit a good CHEQ alternative?+
If you want a transparent, explainable view of invalid traffic — every click weighed against 100+ independent data points and scored 0–100, with the breakdown laid out so you can audit and defend it, plus coverage of native/push/pop networks — ValidVisit is a strong complement or alternative. If your priority today is automated IP exclusion pushed into Google/Meta, CHEQ leads there; that's on ValidVisit's roadmap.
What does ValidVisit do that CHEQ typically doesn't?+
A transparent 0–100 quality score on every click — each one weighed against 100+ independent data points spanning the network it came from, the device behind it and how the visitor behaves, with the breakdown there for you to audit — plus attribution across 46 ad-network tracking tokens including native/push/pop, all without a funnel hop.
Where is CHEQ stronger?+
Broad enterprise feature set spanning click fraud, analytics security and compliance.
Can I run both?+
Yes. Many teams run a blocker for automated exclusion and ValidVisit for independent, transparent measurement and per-publisher evidence across all paid sources.

See what your paid traffic really is.

Bots, fake clicks and invalid traffic detected and scored 0–100 — one script, no funnel hop.

Just your email · no card · unsubscribe anytime · privacy policy

Free trial at launch · lock in early-access pricing

One script · raw IP never stored · GDPR legitimate-interest basis