All comparisons
Comparison

ValidVisit vs Fraud Blocker

PPC click-fraud protection with automated Google Ads IP exclusion. Here’s an honest, side-by-side look at how ValidVisit compares on detection depth, transparency, extra-hop requirements and ad-network coverage.

How ValidVisit works →
Choose ValidVisit if

You want transparent, auditable measurement: every visit scored 0–100 across 100+ data points, attributed to the publisher, zone and placement that sent it — including the native, push and pop networks most tools barely cover.

Choose Fraud Blocker if

Simple, automated IP-exclusion for Google Ads aimed at SMBs.

Many teams run both: a blocker for automated exclusion, ValidVisit for independent scored evidence across every paid source.

01 / COMPARE

Where a flag becomes a score.

Where most tools stop at a per-click verdict, ValidVisit shows the transparent 0–100 score behind every one — per source, auditable, worst first.

Native / push / pop network coverage
ValidVisit
74 networks incl. native/push/pop
Fraud Blocker
Google Ads
Positioning focus
ValidVisit
Transparent measurement & attribution
Fraud Blocker
Automated IP blocking for SMBs
Detects without device fingerprinting or cookies
ValidVisit
Yes — no fingerprint, no cookies
Fraud Blocker
Typically fingerprint-based
Automated IP exclusion in Google / Meta
ValidVisit
Roadmap
Fraud Blocker
Yes — core feature

Fraud Blocker capabilities are based on public positioning and may change — verify on their site. We don’t publish unverifiable accuracy claims about other tools.

validvisit · console
0–49 invalid50–79 suspect80–100 valid
deal-alerts.example18
zone 447158
premium-news.example86

The same 0–100 score on every source, worst first — down to the placement you buy.

02 / WEDGE

What you get that a blocker doesn’t.

Genuine humans pass, bots stand out — and every verdict shows its work.

0–100

An auditable quality score on every visit, built from 100+ data points.

74 networks

Attribution across the native, push and pop channels where invalid traffic concentrates.

No funnel hop

One lightweight script — nothing added to your click path.

03 / TRADE-OFFS

Where Fraud Blocker is stronger.

Simple, automated IP-exclusion for Google Ads aimed at SMBs.

If automated IP exclusion pushed straight into the ad platform is your top priority today, a dedicated blocker like Fraud Blockerleads there. ValidVisit detects, scores and attributes — automated platform exclusion is on our roadmap, and we won’t pretend it’s shipped.

04 / IN DEPTH

ValidVisit vs Fraud Blocker, in depth.

Fraud Blocker is a well-established click-fraud protection tool built for small and mid-sized advertisers running Google Ads. Its core strength is automation: it watches your paid clicks, identifies the IP addresses it judges to be fraudulent or wasteful, and pushes those into your Google Ads IP-exclusion list for you — a real, hands-off blocking capability that keeps known-bad sources from re-clicking your ads. For an SMB that wants "set it and forget it" protection on a single Google Ads account, that automated exclusion is genuinely valuable, and it is something ValidVisit does not do. The one real difference is approach. Fraud Blocker acts on your traffic — it blocks. ValidVisit measures it. We are privacy-first and fingerprint-free by design: every visit is weighed against 100+ independent data points that collapse into a single 0–100 quality score, pinned to the exact source and sub-source that sent it. We report; you decide what to exclude in the ad platform yourself. Different jobs — many teams run both.

Blocking vs. measurement

Fraud Blocker’s model is to act. It maintains an automated exclusion list on your Google Ads account, adding the IP addresses it flags so those visitors stop reaching your ads. When your priority is to stop repeat offenders on a single account with as little manual work as possible, that automation does real work — and it is a capability ValidVisit deliberately does not offer.

ValidVisit’s model is to measure. We sit outside the click path and score every visit that lands, then hand you an independent, per-source record of quality. We never auto-exclude anything in Google Ads, Meta, or any other platform — you carry our scored evidence into the network’s own dashboard and make the exclusion call yourself.

The practical distinction: Fraud Blocker gives you an outcome (a source is blocked); ValidVisit gives you the evidence and the attribution behind it (which sources, how bad, and how consistently). One keeps known-bad IPs out; the other tells you, source by source, where your spend is actually going and why.

Privacy & data approach

This is the sharpest line between the two products. Blocking tools generally lean on IP-level identity — building and enforcing exclusion lists keyed to the addresses they judge fraudulent. That is a legitimate, effective way to stop repeat clicks, and it is central to how automated IP exclusion works.

ValidVisit is fingerprint-free by design. We do not build a persistent identity of your visitors to decide who to block, because we do not block. Instead we read 100+ independent data points about each visit in the moment — the network it arrived over, the device behind it, and how the visitor actually behaves on your page — and collapse them into one 0–100 quality score for that single visit. That privacy-first stance is a deliberate product choice, not a limitation we apologize for: it is why our evidence is about the quality of traffic, not the identity of individuals.

If your organization needs an auditable, privacy-respecting measurement layer that does not depend on tracking people across the web, that design difference matters.

Attribution & evidence you act on

Where blocking answers "was this IP bad," ValidVisit answers "which of my sources are sending Valid, Suspect, or Invalid traffic — and how much." Every scored visit is pinned to the exact campaign, source, and sub-source that delivered it, so a weak publisher, placement, or sub-ID surfaces against your own baseline instead of hiding inside a campaign average.

That report-only, attributed evidence is a different deliverable from an exclusion list. It is independent of the ad platform’s own optimization signals, which means it can show you when a source is quietly corrupting the data your bidding algorithm learns from — before that source has cost you more. You export the Suspect and Invalid sub-sources ValidVisit surfaces and act on them yourself: exclude them, cut bids, or pause them in the network’s dashboard.

Fraud Blocker is genuinely stronger on the last mile of enforcement — the automated push of exclusions. ValidVisit is stronger on breadth of evidence and cross-platform, privacy-first attribution you own.

FAQ

Common questions.

Is ValidVisit a Fraud Blocker alternative?+
It can be, but they solve the problem from opposite ends, so "alternative" undersells the difference. Fraud Blocker is an automated blocker: it flags IPs and excludes them in Google Ads for you. ValidVisit is a privacy-first, report-only measurement layer: we score every visit 0–100, pin it to the exact source, and hand you the evidence to act on yourself. If what you want is hands-off IP blocking on one Google Ads account, Fraud Blocker is purpose-built for that. If you want independent, attributed evidence of traffic quality across your sources — that you own and act on — ValidVisit is the better fit. Many teams pick based on whether they want the tool to act, or to measure.
Fraud Blocker vs. ValidVisit — what’s the key difference?+
Fraud Blocker acts on your traffic; ValidVisit measures it. Fraud Blocker automatically adds flagged IP addresses to your Google Ads exclusion list — real, hands-off blocking we don’t offer. ValidVisit sits outside the click path, is fingerprint-free by design, and scores every visit against 100+ data points into a single 0–100 quality score pinned to the source that sent it. We report; you decide what to exclude in the platform. So the honest one-liner: choose Fraud Blocker if you want automated enforcement on Google Ads, choose ValidVisit if you want privacy-first, per-source evidence you control — and note that Fraud Blocker is genuinely stronger on the automated-enforcement last mile.
Can I use both Fraud Blocker and ValidVisit together?+
Yes, and the two complement each other cleanly because they do different jobs. Let Fraud Blocker handle automated IP exclusion on your Google Ads account — that’s its strength. Run ValidVisit alongside it as an independent measurement and attribution layer: we score every visit and show you, source by source, where Suspect and Invalid traffic is concentrated across your campaigns, including places a Google-Ads-focused blocker may not reach. You get automated enforcement from one and privacy-first, ownable evidence from the other. Nothing about our report-only approach conflicts with a blocker running in the click path.
Does ValidVisit block invalid traffic or auto-exclude it like Fraud Blocker does?+
No — and that’s intentional. ValidVisit does not block, auto-exclude in ad platforms, or guarantee refunds. Automated IP exclusion is exactly where Fraud Blocker is strong and we are honest that we don’t offer it. What we do is measure: we score every visit 0–100, attribute it to the exact source and sub-source, and surface the Valid/Suspect/Invalid breakdown as report-only evidence. You take that cut-list into the network’s own dashboard and exclude, pause, or lower bids yourself. It keeps you in control of every exclusion decision and avoids over-blocking sources that had an isolated spike rather than a structural problem.
deal-alerts.example18
zone 447158
premium-news.example86

Judge the verdicts on your own traffic.

One script, every visit scored 0–100 and attributed to the source that sent it — see what your paid traffic really is.

Just your email · no card · unsubscribe anytime · privacy policy

Free trial at launch · just your email

One script · no cookies · no fingerprinting · raw IP never stored